Legal Opinion
Mullin v. Rochester Manpower, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 7, 2002No. 00-CV-6257 CJS (B)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
Plaintiff raises claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, the Family & Medical Leave Act and the New York State Human Rights law. Previously, on January 17, 2002, this Court entered a decision and order granting plaintiffs application to amend her complaint. The case is now before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket # 19) seeking dismissal of the Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1
Rochester Manpower, Inc., is a domestic…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pellegrino v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- McKenzie v. Erie County Medical Center CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Samantha DeJesus v. Bon Secours Community Hospital and Lyn WesselsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026