Sage v. Flueck
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The dominant question is whether a joint and survivorship deposit account belongs to'the estate of its creator or to the surviving joint depositors.
In Ohio, a surviving joint depositor has a right to the proceeds of a joint and survivorship bank account, not as an incident to joint tenancy, which is not recognized in Ohio (Sergeant v. Steinberger, 2 Ohio, 305, 15 Am. Dec., 553; Wilson and Marsh v. Fleming, 13 Ohio, 68; Tax Comm. v. Hutchison, 120 Ohio St., 361, 166 N. E., 352; In re Estate of Hutchison, 120 Ohio St., 542, 166 N. E., 687), but arising out of the contract of deposit.
“While…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Kelly v. . BeersNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Estate of HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commerce Trust Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Wright v. BloomOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Beach v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Eger v. EgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.