Aydlett v. Keim
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendant excepted to the submission of the third issue. Therefore, it becomes necessary to determine whether the evidence adduced in the trial below is sufficient to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on that issue. And in our opinion there is no evidence to support an affirmative answer thereto.
The doctrine of last clear chance or discovered peril is firmly established in our law; and is clearly and concisely stated by Barnhill, J., speaking for the Court in Ingram v. Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc., 225 N.C. 444, 35 S.E. 2d 337, as follows : “Tbe contributory negligence of tbe…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Irby v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Battle v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.