Carlisle v. ONE (1) BOAT
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
RECKTENWALD, C.J.
Petitioner-Appellant Peter B. Carlisle, in his official capacity as the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu, on behalf of the State of Hawai'i (the State), filed a Verified Petition for Forfeiture seeking to forfeit property including a boat. That property was allegedly used to commit intentional violations of Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) §§ 13-95-70, entitled Stony corals, and 13-95-71, entitled Live rocks.
Claimants/Interested Persons-Appellees Dang Van Tran (Dang) and Sang Tran (Sang) (collectively, Claimants) filed a motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. NakataHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlisle v. One (1) BoatHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Estate of Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- Bowen v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011