Tankersley Inv. Co. v. Tankersley Inv. Co. ex rel. Tankersley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, V. C. J.. The principal question presented by this appeal is one of fact and that is the controlling question, as we view it.
That question is whether Earl Tank-ersley sold and Dan Tankersley bought Earl’s stock in the Tankersley Investment Company. For brevity the two will be referred to by their first names. Earl contends he did not sell or agree to sell. Dan contends they did agree and that he bought and fully paid for Earl’s stock, in complete compliance with the agreement.
It is our duty to affirm on the fact question unless we find the trial court conclusion to be contrary to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Turben v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Payne v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Crabtree v. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Uhrina v. MastakoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tankersley Inv. Co. ex rel. Tankersley v. R. H. Siegfried Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Tankersley Inv. Co. ex rel. Tankersley v. R. H. Siegfried Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Tankersley Inv. Co. ex rel. Tankersley v. TankersleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950