Uhrina v. Mastako

Opinion by

PINKHAM. C.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in error, Andrew Uhrina, guardian, from a judgment of the district court of Pittsburg county, approving and confirming the final report of Prank Masta-ko, administrator of the estate of John Pet-rick, deceased.

The following are the material facts;

On July 19, 1919, the defendant in error was duly appointed adminstrator of said .estate; he qualified as administrator and letters of administration were duly issued. Subsequently the defendant in error, as administrator, filed his inventory and appraisement in the county court of Pittsburg…