Legal Opinion
Mullenix v. Forsyth Dental Infirmary for Children
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 13, 1996No. Civ. A. 94-10449-PBSPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 92); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS III AND IV OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET ENTRY # 96)
August 14, 1996
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before this court are two motions for partial summary judgment filed in the above styled employment discrimination ease. Defendants Forsyth Dental Infirmary for Children, Forsyth Dental Center and Forsyth Research Center (collectively: “Forsyth”) move for summary judgment on certain claims in Count I of the third amended…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Beaupre v. Cliff Smith & AssociatesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Maldonado-Cordero v. AT & TDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Scott v. Sulzer Carbomedics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Landrau Romero v. Caribbean Restaurants, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998
- Morehouse v. Berkshire Gas Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.