Legal Opinion

Scott v. Sulzer Carbomedics, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 21, 2001No. C.A. 98-10711-NGPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Deborah Scott (“Scott”), brings this action against the defendants, Sulzer Carbomedics, Inc. (“Sulzer”), Mark Hamlet (“Hamlet”), and Robert White (“White”) alleging discrimination on a variety of grounds. 1 The core claim involves disparate treatment and mixed-motive discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act, and analogous state legislation.

At their inception, these statutes comprised broad remedial legislation, and the earlier case law emphasized the importance of their progressive goals. E.g.…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vesprini v. Shaw Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  2. Allen v. FullerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  3. American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
  4. American European Insurance Group, Inc. v. NEI General Contracting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
  5. Clergeau v. Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API