United States v. Venable
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
Defendant was convicted of making false statements to a grand jury. He seeks a new trial on the grounds that in closing argument the prosecutor commented upon defendant’s failure to testify, thus violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. For the reasons which follow, defendant’s motion must be granted.
At trial, the government’s chief witness was Joseph Baldino, who testified that he gave defendant, Edward Venable) the chairman of the Delaware County Housing Authority, $500. on three separate occasions in 1973 as payment for Baldino’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. John FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Francisco Adriano Armedo-Sarmiento, AKA Eduardo Sanchez, AKA Pacho El Mono, AKA Elkin, AKA Francisco VelezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Edward G. VenableCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. CianciulliDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- United States v. VenableDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- State v. BurchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- United States v. HuntDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005