Legal Opinion
United States v. Cianciulli
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 17, 1979No. Crim. 79-165-1, 79-165-2 and 79-165-6PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the post-trial motions of defendants Matthew J. Cianciulli, Jr. (“Cianciulli”), Joseph R. Ricca (“Ricca”) and Anthony Fiorentino (“Fiorentino”) for judgment of acquittal, arrest of judgment and new trial, pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 29, 33 and 34. After a careful and exhaustive examination of the relevant statutes, decisional law, the record and arguments of counsel, in their briefs and at oral argument, the motions were denied by the Court’s Order dated October 23, 1979, and the within Memorandum Opinion is in support…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Edward Howard and Thomas CusackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ella M. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. LincolnHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States v. FureyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.