Legal Opinion

G & H Development, LLC v. Penwell

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided March 26, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-0272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RULING

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR., District Judge.

Before the Court is a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Claims against Defen*660dants Doyle Adams (“Adams”), Jim Morris (“Morris”), and Fred Rankin (“Rankin”), Individually, and the Benton-Parish Metropolitan Board of Adjustment (“the Board of Adjustment” or “the Board”) for Judicial Immunity. See Record Document 38. Plaintiff G & H Development, LLC (“G & H”) opposed the motion. See Record Document 43. For the reasons which follow, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

I.BACKGROUND.

G & H is engaged in the business of developing immovable property…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mills v. City of ShreveportDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2014
  2. GateHouse Water LLC v. Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API