Legal Opinion
Tisa v. Potofsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 14, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for a temporary injunction and defendants have cross-moved for an order dismissing the action on a variety of grounds, including want of jurisdiction. Alternatively, the defendants have made a motion to transfer the case to the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a). For obvious reasons, I shall first address myself to the cross-motion. The action, which is for a permanent injunction and for a declaratory judgment, is brought by John Tisa, Armando Valdes, and Donald Henderson, three members of the Food, Tobacco,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Polin v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Otto v. ProtectiveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Green v. ObergfellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Spayd v. Ringing Rock LodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Antonio Copra v. Jose A. SuroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Advertising Specialty National Association v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Hurwitz v. Directors Guild of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Murray v. SevierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Gregory Oskoian, Etc. v. Theobald J. Canuel, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.