Legal Opinion
Garner v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 1982No. 58072PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
This is an application to assume original jurisdiction and for a writ of mandamus. The essential and undisputed facts on the basis of which jurisdiction and relief are sought are as follows:
Respondent, City of Tulsa, is a municipal corporation and a city of the first class under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. Respondent operates under a home-rule charter approved by the Governor on January 5, 1909.
Petitioner Thomas L. Baker is president of Local No. 176, International Association of Fire Fighters, an unincorporated association, which is the exclusive bargaining agent for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Midwest City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Voss v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Poulos v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Association of Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Independent School District 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Thomas B. Hennigh v. City of Shawnee, Terry Powell, and Hank LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.