Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Pernsley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-7143PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, Senior District Judge.

In the present action, the plaintiffs, John J. McLaughlin and Marilyn M. McLaughlin, allege that the defendants, the City of Philadelphia Department of Human Services and its Commissioner, Irene Pernsley, violated their rights under the United States Constitution when the defendants, pursuant to their policy against cross-racial long-term foster care placements and adoptions, removed Raymond Bullard, a black child committed to plaintiffs’ foster care, from plaintiffs’ home on October 18, 1985. 1

Raymond Bullard lived with the plaintiffs, a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. New York CityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  2. McLaughlin v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. In re G.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. McLaughlin v. PernsleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Faison v. Sex Crimes Unit of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API