Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Pernsley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-7143PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, Senior District Judge.

In the present action, the plaintiffs, John J. McLaughlin and Marilyn M. McLaughlin, allege that the defendants, the City of Philadelphia Department of Human Services and its Commissioner, Irene Pernsley, violated their rights under the United States Constitution when the defendants, pursuant to their policy against cross-racial long-term foster care placements and adoptions, removed Raymond Bullard, a black child committed to plaintiffs’ foster care, from plaintiffs’ home on October 18, 1985. 1

Raymond Bullard lived with the plaintiffs, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Elwell v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Fuller v. HardingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 2633 in Circuit Court for Washington CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. DeWees v. StevensonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API