Legal Opinion

State v. Rachel

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 27, 1999No. 98-2074PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Tory L. Rachel appeals a nonfinal order of the trial court ruling that the findings and conclusions of a court-appointed expert are subject to discovery in a ch. 980, Stats., proceeding. Because the rules of civil procedure, chs. 801 to 847, Stats., govern procedure in ch. 980 proceedings, § 804.01, Stats., applies in this case. Under that section, the report of an expert is not discoverable unless that expert will be called as a witness at trial. See § 804.01(2)(d). Here, it was not clear whether Rachel would call the expert at trial. Thus, the trial court's order allowing discovery was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Dudek v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RachelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. ThielCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. State v. BauschCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  5. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API