Legal Opinion
Foster v. Churchill
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1996PublishedCited by 267 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
The issues presented by this appeal are (1) whether the Appellate Division erred in concluding that appellants had not established a claim of tortious interference and (2) whether the Appellate Division erred in affirming the dismissal of appellants’ defamation claim.
Appellants Mark Foster and Don Franco are the founders and former chief executive officers of defendant Microband Companies Incorporated (Microband). * Microband, incorporated in Delaware, with offices in New York, Washington, D.C., and Detroit, was engaged in the wireless multichannel cable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Stukuls v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- NBT Bancorp Inc. v. Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Rich v. Fox News Network, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Elias v. Rolling Stone LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.