Legal Opinion
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. v. Batra
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 4, 2006No. 06 Civ.2035(RWS)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (“Estee Lauder”) has moved by order to show cause for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., to restrain defendant Shashi Batra (“Batra”) from breaching the terms of his Confidentiality, Non-solicitation, and Non-competition Agreement with Estee Lauder (the “Non-compete Agreement”) and from engaging in employment with N.V. Perricone M.D. Ltd. (“Perricone”).
Batra has cross-moved seeking this Court to abstain or alternatively for a stay, citing Colorado River Water…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Abercrombie v. Andrew CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Medtech Products Inc. v. RANIR, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Dalzell Management Co. v. Bardonia Plaza, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.