Legal Opinion
G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. v. Bradshaw
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1998No. Nos. 95-56639, 96-55194PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
This ease requires us to decide whether certain California Labor Code provisions, authorizing the state to seize money and impose penalties for a subcontractor’s failure to *898comply with prevailing wage requirements, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because no notice or hearing is required before such adverse action is taken. Specifically, Victoria L. Bradshaw, Labor Commissioner of the State of California, and others appeal the district court’s order granting summary…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carver v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Brown v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.