Legal Opinion

United States v. Osticco

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1983No. Crim. 82-00149-01PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendant has filed a motion for a bill of particulars and a motion for discovery in the above-captioned criminal matter. For the reasons set forth below the particulars motion is denied in part and granted in part and the discovery motion is denied. 1

II. Background

On October 19,1982, a federal grand jury returned a two count indictment charging defendant and Charles F. Córtese with violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1503. Count One is directed at a conspiracy to obstruct justice by influencing a petit juror, Roseanne M. Donahue (then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. William Joseph MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. LovecchioDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. United States v. CorteseDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API