Tatum v. Geist
Washington Supreme Court
.Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, ■ Hatch, J., entered April 5, 1906, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
Appellants brought this action to recover the contract price of a planing machine sold to respondents. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Findings were made and judgment entered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
The facts are as follows: On November 20, 1903, the respondents ordered a new Northwest planer from the plaintiffs’ agent at Seattle. The agent agreed to have the machine forwarded from Portland, Oregon. Thereupon the following memorandum of agreement was entered into:
‘Tl-20:03.
“Terms 3 per cent, off for cash, or 1-3 down, bal. 3’ mos., or…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Goodwin v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Jones v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- McDougall v. O'ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.