Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Geist

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1896No. 6821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J. There was error in the seventh instruction. (Compiled Statutes, ch. 16, sec. 104; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. State, 22 Kan., 1; State v. Heins, 14 Neb., 479; Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Metcalf, 44 Neb., 848; Omaha é R. V. R. Co. v. Talbot, 48 Neb., 627.) References: Omaha, N. & B. H. R. Co. v. O'Donnell, 22 Neb., 475; Union P. R. Co. v. Rasmussen, 25 Neb., 810.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Lena Geist, a girl, at the time of the commencement of this action, six years of age, by her father and next friend, Anton Geist, instituted these proceedings in the district court of Douglas county against the defendant railroad company to recover damages alleged to have accrued to her by reason of injuries caused by the negligence of the *491defendant company. It was pleaded that the injuries to plaintiff were received May 3, 1892, at a place where a line of railroad operated by the defendant crossed Nicholas street, in the city of Omaha, and where it devolved upon defendant, as a duty, to have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. TalbotNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kansas City & Omaha Railroad v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. RassmussenNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stevens v. LutherNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rule v. Claar Transfer & Storage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Camerlinck v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Melcher v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API