Legal Opinion

Kansas City & Omaha Railroad v. Rogers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1896No. 6601PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Adams county. Tried below before Beall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Rogers sued the railroad company, charging that in September, 1891, it negligently omitted to keep its right of way free from combustible materials, and permitted large quantities of grass and weeds to accumulate upon its right of way near the premises of the plaintiff, and that the servants of the railroad company negligently set fire to the grass, weeds, and combustible materials accumulated on the right of way and negligently permitted, said fire to pass upon the lands of the plaintiff, whereby 204 forest trees, of the value of f300, were burned and destroyed. The answer amounted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. TalbotNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fremont, E. & M. V. R. v. CrumNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Powers v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. EmmertNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. HarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Boyd v. Lincoln & Northwestern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. GeistNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Alberts v. HusenetterNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API