Legal Opinion
Amador v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 24, 2003No. A03A0793PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
This case began as a quia timet (quiet title) action by a property owner, Jeffrey Thomas, against two materialman’s lien claimants, Rodney Amador and James Taylor. After Amador and Taylor can-celled their liens, Thomas’s claim against them for defamation of title remained pending, as did their counterclaims for breach of contract and fraud. Amador appeals final judgment entered on a jury verdict in Thomas’s favor. Finding that the trial court erred when it answered a question from the jury, we reverse.
Thomas owns improved residential property on which Amador and Taylor filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daniels v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Veazy v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Hicks v. McLain's Building Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Garrett v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Second Continental, Inc. v. Atlanta E-Z Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Roofing Supply of Atlanta, Inc. v. Forrest Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Trench Shoring Services of Atlanta, Inc. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- 182 Tenth, LLC v. Manhattan Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- 182 Tenth, LLC v. Manhattan Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012