Legal Opinion

Short v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1938No. 26922. En BancPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs, C. P. and Nellie Short, sued Pierce and King counties jointly, demanding judgment for $3,750, by way of damages to a tract of real estate in Pierce county, owned by plaintiffs, bordering on the Puyallup river, which land suffered damage during the high water of December, 1933. During the flood period above referred'to, plaintiffs’ land suffered from erosion, plaintiffs contending that approximately two acres were washed away. The balance of the land was damaged by agents and employees of Pierce county while engaged in an endeavor to control the high water, plaintiffs in this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Paulson v. County of PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. City of Rapid City v. BolandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Marty v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API