Legal Opinion

Honeysuckle v. Curtis H. Stout, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 16, 2010No. 09-1222PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM GUNTER, Justice.

liThis is a workers’ compensation case in which the main issue is whether Appellee Michael McCarthy is immune from tort liability pursuant to the exclusive-remedy statute found at Ark.Code Ann. § 11 — 9— 105 (Repl.2002). The Workers’ Compensation Commission determined that McCarthy was protected by the statutory immunity because he was Appellant Carlos Honeysuckle’s employer at the time of the accident that caused his compensable injury. This case was first submitted to the court of appeals, which reversed the decision of the Commission. Appellee Michael McCarthy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. AG Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Brown v. FinneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Stocks v. Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Coonrod v. SeaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Moses v. Hanna's Candle Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Hudak-Lee v. Baxter County Regional HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. Pope County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Hendrix v. Alcoa, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Wilhelm v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API