Coonrod v. Seay
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
Clifford Coonrod d/b/a Coonrod Construction Co., petitions this court for a writ of prohibition in response to the circuit court’s denial of his summary-judgment motion. Coonrod argues that the circuit court does not have jurisdiction to decide whether the Workers’ Compensation Act, as codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 11-9-101 through 11-9-1001 (Repl. 2002 & Supp. 2005), bars Respondent Ronnie Seay from filing suit against him for negligence. In support of his argument, Coonrod asserts that the Workers’ Compensation Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Nucor Holding Corp. v. RinkinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- VanWagoner v. Beverly EnterprisesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Merez v. Squire Court Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Stocks v. Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- International Paper Co. v. Clark County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Honeysuckle v. Curtis H. Stout, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Reynolds Metal Co. v. Circuit Court of Clark CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. Pope County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Wilhelm v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.