Legal Opinion

Coonrod v. Seay

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 2006No. 06-404PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

Clifford Coonrod d/b/a Coonrod Construction Co., petitions this court for a writ of prohibition in response to the circuit court’s denial of his summary-judgment motion. Coonrod argues that the circuit court does not have jurisdiction to decide whether the Workers’ Compensation Act, as codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 11-9-101 through 11-9-1001 (Repl. 2002 & Supp. 2005), bars Respondent Ronnie Seay from filing suit against him for negligence. In support of his argument, Coonrod asserts that the Workers’ Compensation Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Nucor Holding Corp. v. RinkinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. VanWagoner v. Beverly EnterprisesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Merez v. Squire Court Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Stocks v. Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. Clark County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Honeysuckle v. Curtis H. Stout, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Reynolds Metal Co. v. Circuit Court of Clark CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. Pope County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Wilhelm v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API