Legal Opinion
PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 13, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02129Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 PLAYUP, INC., Case No. 2:21-cv-02129-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. [Docket No. 78] 10 DR. LAILA MINTAS, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to amend the counterclaims. Docket No. 13 78. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 107. Defendant filed a reply. Docket No. 14 112.1 The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons 15 discussed below, the motion for leave to amend is hereby GRANTED.2 16 I. STANDARDS 17 Requests for leave to amend the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Patrick Novak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Netbula, LLC v. Distinct Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Morgal v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.