Legal Opinion
Umphrey v. Auyer
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1919No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Osceola; Cutler (Hal. L.), J. Bill by William F. Umphrey against Fred Auyer for the foreclosure of a mortgage. From the decree rendered, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
{after stating the facts). There would appear to be no dispute between the parties upon the facts in this case except that the plaintiff claims that *278the 10 per cent, was exacted by James R. Postal as a commission to himself for negotiating the loan from his wife to the defendant, while defendant claims that the 10 per cent, was exacted by Postal as a bonus to his wife for making the loan. This conflict in the claims of the parties under our view of the case is unimportant. The statute, 2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5998, provides:
“No bond, bill, note, contract or assurance, made or given for or upon a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Hogan v. Hester Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Cooper v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Patterson v. AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934