Hunsche v. City of Loveland
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Winkler, Judge.
Appellees filed suit against the city of Loveland, claiming negligence, negligence per se, statutory nuisance, common-law nuisance, and trespass for the city’s alleged misconduct in allowing sediment from a city-owned park to flow into, and thereby damage, appellees’ pond. The trial court found in favor of appellees on all counts and awarded compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney fees. The city appeals from that order.
I. FACTS
The city owns Boike Park, which is located in Symmes Township, outside the Loveland city limits. Appellees are owners of properties within…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Prudential Co-Operative Realty Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Williamson v. PavlovichOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Hacker v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Butler v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Cincinnati v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Butler v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Erie Ins. Co. v. F Street Invests., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025