RPR & Associates, Inc. v. State
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge McGEE
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority opinion’s broad construction of N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 143.135.3(d) and (d).
*533I do not disagree with the majority opinion that the General Assembly provided a contractor an alternative appeal option under N.C.G.S. § 143-135.3(d) for a dissatisfied contractor to appeal from the decision of the OSC. However, once plaintiff contractor selected the option of “commencing]” its case under N.C.G.S. § 143-135.3(cl) by filing a petition with the OAH, it could not then “institute” a complaint in superior court under N.C.G.S. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Lincoln Construction Co. v. Property Control & Construction Division of the Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- In re Thompson Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986