Turem v. Texaco, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
A motion for summary judgment was made and granted in favor of respondent. The motion was predicated upon a record consisting of the complaint of Mike Turem and Sarah Turem, 1 appellants, (Turem), the amended and supplemental answer of Texaco, Inc., (Texaco), William Howard and Clyde Reisdorf, 2 respondents, the record of proceeding in the municipal court and the judgment entered therein hereafter referred to, and the declarations of Mike Turem in opposition and those of Clyde Reisdorf and William Howard, in support of the motion. The motion was granted. Judgment was entered thereon in favor…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Schubert v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Munden v. HazelriggWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Erbe Corp. v. W & B REALTY CO.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Cohen v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967