Legal Opinion
Emison v. Growe
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1992No. Civ. 4-91-202PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAY, Circuit Judge, and MAGNUSON, District Judge.
In 1982, this court established Minnesota’s congressional districts, see LaComb v. Growe, 541 F.Supp. 145 (D.Minn.), aff'd sub nom. Orwoll v. LaComb, 456 U.S. 966, 102 S.Ct. 2228, 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982), and Minnesota’s state legislative districts, see LaComb v. Growe, 541 F.Supp. 160 (D.Minn.1982), as reflected in Minnesota Statutes §§ 2.019, 2.042, 2.702 (1983). At that time, this court also established minority concentrated districts in an attempt to preserve the voting strength of minority populations.
Over the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996
- De Grandy v. WetherellDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1992
- DeBaca v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1992
- Magray v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.