Legal Opinion

DeBaca v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 11, 1992No. Civ. 91-1282-R(M)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO ENJOIN THE JUNE 2, 1992 ELECTION AND FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

RHOADES, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, a Hispanic woman, an African-American man, and an Asian-American woman, have brought this class action alleging that the county’s 1991 redistricting plan violates the rights of San Diego County Hispanic, African-American, and Asian-American citizens under the equal protec tion clause of the fourteenth amendment and under § 2 et seq. of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq. 1 The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Rural West Tennessee African-American Affairs Council, Inc. v. McWherterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
  3. De Grandy v. WetherellDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1992
  4. Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting CommissionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005
  5. Aldasoro v. KennersonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API