Legal Opinion
Clement v. Dunn
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1931No. Docket No. 6466PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J., pro tem.
The negligent driving of a Los Angeles County car by Deputy Sheriff Dunn, resulting in damage to the person and property of the plaintiff, was made the basis of this action against the sheriff and the sureties on his official bond. To the complaint, which attempted to set up two causes of action, a general demurrer, interposed by the sheriff and his sureties, was sustained. Plaintiff declined to amend, and a judgment of dismissal and this appeal followed.
In addition to allegations sufficiently introducing the several defendants, and others portraying the results of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Foley v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Van Pelt v. LittlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- People ex rel. Tamplin v. BeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Styers v. . Forsyth CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Culpepper v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Reed v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Ferner v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.