Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pershall v. Woolsey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1978No. P-76-6, CA 8131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

The state appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of respondent in a filiation proceeding (ORS 109.125 et seq) and assigns as error the admission in evidence, over petitioner’s objection, of a letter from an Assistant Attorney General to defense counsel which, it is contended, contained prejudicial hearsay statements not excepted from the exclusionary rule. Respondent cross-appeals, claiming abuse of discretion in the amount of attorney’s fees awarded to him; our disposition of the case makes it unnecessary to consider this matter.

The relevant part of the letter involved in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GoodinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State Ex Rel. Dickerson v. TokstadOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Human Services Department v. ColemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Pershall v. WoolseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Fox v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Pershall v. WoolseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API