Legal Opinion
Silva v. Linneman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1946No. Civ. 7199PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
From a judgment that plaintiff take nothing in this suit to recover an alleged balance due upon contract for expenses incurred incident to the maintenance of a dairy enterprise, this appeal was perfected.
The eomplaifit is couched in three counts. The first cause of action alleges that an unpaid balance of $2,250.38 is due plaintiff according to the terms of a contract attached to the complaint, for one-half of the purchase price of hay, feed and concentrates and for the expense incurred in testing cows incident to the operation of a dairy. The second cause is for the same amount alleged to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GandyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Cowdery v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Abbott v. Limited Mutual Compensation Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Edelman v. McDonellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Producers Holding Co. v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Judelson v. American Metal Bearing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Edmonds v. Valley National Bank of ArizonaWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Bedell v. MashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cramer v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.