Legal Opinion

Moss v. Goldstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of contract for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff being assignee of the account from Peter Benoit, the vendor. On separate dates, beginning August 22, 1924, and ending September 4, 1924, seven lots of shoes were sold to the defendant at an agreed price for each lot, the whole, amounting to $3,662, with credits of $1,200 on August 22 and of $2,079.20 on September 4, leaving a balance of $382.80. The answer, in addition to a general denial and defence of payment, alleges delivery by the defendant and acceptance by the plaintiff’s assignor of a check in the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Whittaker Chain Tread Co. v. Standard Auto Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Specialty Glass Co. v. DaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shumaker v. Lucerne-in-Maine Community Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. State v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Bascombe v. InferreraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Dedham Lumber Co. v. HartungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Dickman v. McClellanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API