Ashland Coal & Coke Co. v. Old Ben Coal Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The only question raised by the defendant’s motion that need be considered is whether the undisputed facts clearly showed an accord and satisfaction legally binding on the plaintiffs, or whether the effect of cashing or depositing the various checks sent by the Old Ben Coal Corporation to them was properly submitted to the jury.
To constitute an accord and satisfaction, there must not only be a new agreement based on an offer, and the acceptance of that offer, as made, like any other contract, but that agreement must, also, be acted on. 3…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ostrander v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Whittaker Chain Tread Co. v. Standard Auto Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Acierno v. Worthy Brothers Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- State v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Empire Box Corp. v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1944
- Modern Dust Bag Co. v. Commercial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Cerasoli v. SchneiderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.