Morris v. Keil
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for • Dakota county, refusing a new trial. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner and in possession of a certain tract of land, brought this action to recover- damages .for trespasses alleged to have been committed thereupon by defendant.
To maintain his title and possession, plaintiff offered in evidence the record of a quit-claim deed of the locus in quo, running to himself, the introductory and in testimonium, clauses of which, together with the form of execution, are as follows, viz.: “ Know all men by these presents, that, the Oxford Female College, (an institution of learning duly and legally incorporated,)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Lovett v. Steam Saw Mill Ass'nNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- St. Louis Public Schools v. RisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Meighen v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
3Cited by10 opinions
- Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Barcello v. . HapgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Gorder v. Plattsmouth Canning Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Saltmarsh v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Burnett v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.