Legal Opinion

Morris v. Keil

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for • Dakota county, refusing a new trial. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Berry, J.

The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner and in possession of a certain tract of land, brought this action to recover- damages .for trespasses alleged to have been committed thereupon by defendant.

To maintain his title and possession, plaintiff offered in evidence the record of a quit-claim deed of the locus in quo, running to himself, the introductory and in testimonium, clauses of which, together with the form of execution, are as follows, viz.: “ Know all men by these presents, that, the Oxford Female College, (an institution of learning duly and legally incorporated,)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Lovett v. Steam Saw Mill Ass'nNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. St. Louis Public Schools v. RisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Meighen v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Barcello v. . HapgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Gorder v. Plattsmouth Canning Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Saltmarsh v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Burnett v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API