Legal Opinion

Meighen v. Strong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1861PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL EEOM THE_|DJCT.IiíCT|;PQpEff[lQEife[L!E¿MGLpÍ!¡COróTT.J rtfr...-vm itju.snii, iu»Urt7Í¿h»:>. bus tnmobi-.vi Innt» A- — .VI .,u,,oq niisiun-m (4 ji-r üwAWA |Aw.\.A\ T) ,m\>A\ 1!I írH&fc /íHe de; ¿bf^lied 'w^'ñ; anillé 4naw <°i lTb oiIT — py. tbe'presence of bnt on‘e witness, conveyed nothing, and the record thereof ought not to have been admitted in evidence. Pub. Stats., chap. 85, sec. 8, and 11 to 22 mcl.; Act of July 26, 1858, sec. 1/ Pub.

Read the full summary

1Opinion of the Court

By the Oowrt —

Emmett, C. J. —

This action was brought under that provision of our statute which authorizes any person in possession of real property by himself or tenant, to commence an action against any one claiming an adverse interest or estate therein, for the purpose of having such adverse estate or interest determined. Comp. Stat., 595, See. 1. The evident design of the legislature in passing this act, was to give to parties in possession of real property, the same facilities for testing the merits of adverse claims of title, that are always at hand for those who are excluded from the…

2Cited by8 opinions

Eadie v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
Herr v. Denver Milling & Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
Proulx v. Hirsch Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
Morris v. KeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.