Legal Opinion
Morris v. Toy Box
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 1962No. Civ. 25630PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal following a declination to amend his first amended complaint, a demurrer thereto having been sustained with leave to amend.
The asserted cause of action is for damages arising from the sale by Toy Box, a Pasadena retailer, of a bow and arrow to one Mary Boyd who; in turn, permitted its use by her ,10-year-old son, Randy. Both mother and son were also named as defendants. Plaintiff-min or, then 4 years of age, was struck by.an arrow shot by Randy; as a result, he has lost •the sight of his left eye. .
• Omitting allegations immaterial to this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Weil v. BarthelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brown v. San Francisco Ball Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Tingey v. E. F. Houghton & Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bayamon Thom McAn Inc. v. Eileen Josefina Miranda, Kiddielane Florida Corporation v. Eileen Josefina MirandaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Pitts v. BasileIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Killeen v. Harmon Grain Products, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Burke v. Almaden Vineyards, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bojorquez v. House of Toys, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.