Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Level

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1995No. 2-94-193-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARDS, Justice.

Richard Hamill (Hamill) appeals from the trial court’s order granting Julie Ann Level’s (Level) motion to dismiss with prejudice. Following the guidelines for appellate review of “death penalty” discovery sanctions, we hold the trial court’s imposition of the ultimate sanction under these circumstances was not an abuse of discretion. We affirm the ruling of the trial court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This" case involves a negligence suit for damages arising out of an automobile accident between Hamill and Level on May 14, 1991. On November 24, 1992, Hamill filed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamill v. LevelTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Humphreys v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. ADKINS SERVICES INC. v. Tisdale Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Gentry v. Weaver Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Estate of Riggins, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API