Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Level

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1996No. 95-0783PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this case is whether the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiffs claims with prejudice for failing to comply with the defendant’s discovery requests. The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal. 900 S.W.2d 457. Because the imposition of a “death penalty” sanction in this case is excessive, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Richard Hamill and Julie Ann Level were involved in an automobile accident on May 14, 1991. On November 24, 1992, Hamill sued Level for negligence,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hamill v. LevelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Paselk v. Rabun, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  3. Falk & Mayfield L.L.P. v. Molzan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Williams v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1999
  5. In Re Zenergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API