Legal Opinion
Baker v. BP America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 90CV0911PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Geoffrey Baker, the Hawk Corporation, and Walter Wright brought this securities fraud claim against BP America, Inc., under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; the complaint also in-eludes pendant state law claims for fraud and breach of contract. BP responded with a counterclaim against the three plaintiffs for contribution, and a third-party complaint against Cimcast Corporation for contribution and indemnification for all but the breach…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Baker v. BP America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Chutich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Chutich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Kearney v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997