Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Jandernoa

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 21, 1997No. 1:95-CV-823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

This case is a derivative action against, among others, officers and directors of Perri-go Company (“Perrigo”). Before this Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Henry L. Hillman and C.G. Grefenstette (“Hillman Defendants”).

In October of 1993, a secondary public offering was held of 13,000,000 shares of Perrigo stock. Plaintiffs bring this derivative suit against, among others, the Hillman Defendants on several grounds, including: 1) “breach of fiduciary duty in misappropriating and misusing internal proprietary non-public material adverse corporate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Omega Research, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
  2. Kearney v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API