McConville v. Ingham
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 78, Oct. T., 1920, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1918, No. 278, dismissing bill in equity in case of Martha McConville v. Martha J. Ingham and the Mellon National Bank of Pittsburgh. Bill in equity for injunction and an accounting. Before Carnahan, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the bill. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was decree, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
The dramatis personae in this case are: Plaintiff, a widow, aged 92, who had three sons, two daughters and a number of grandchildren, and by thrift and economy had accumulated a small estate; a granddaughter, aged 23, hereafter called the defendant, to whom plaintiff had *510delivered checks for a large part of the small estate, which defendant deposited in her own name in the Mellon National Bank of Pittsburgh (also a defendant, but hereafter called the bank), instead of in plaintiff’s name, as the latter says should have been done, and, because they were not, filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Worrall's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Maxler v. HawkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Stepp v. FramptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Hartman v. Pittsburg Incline Plane Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Bergner v. BergnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Yeager's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Lochinger v. HanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Young v. HippleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.