Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Stewart

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 18, 2000No. AC 17791; AC 18086PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Delores D. Stewart, appeals in AC 17791 from the trial court’s denial of her “motion for payment,” in which she alleged that she was owed back alimony. The trial court ruled that the plaintiffs claim had been previously denied by the court in 1993 and that the judgment had been affirmed by this court in Stewart v. Stewart, 41 Conn. App. 906, 675 A.2d 10, cert. denied, 237 Conn. 929, 678 A.2d 484 (1996). We conclude, as to the plaintiffs claims in AC 17791, that the trial court correctly ruled that the matter had been previously determined in Stewart v. Stewart, supra,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sablosky v. SabloskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Zahringer v. ZahringerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Alder v. AlderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API