Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. . Lockhart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

Tbe question for decision is whether a judicial separation froto bed and board for two years affords ground for divorce under cb. 100, Public Laws 1937. Tbe law answers in tbe affirmative. Compare Si tterson v. Sitterson, 191 N. C., 319, 131 S. E., 641; Lee v. Lee, 182 N. C., 61, 108 S. E., 352.

Tbe plaintiff brought an action in 1939 for divorce on tbe ground of two years’ separation. Tbe defendant answered, admitted tbe separation since 1936, and set up a cross action for a divorce a mensa et thoro and alimony, alleging that tbe plaintiff bad wrongfully abandoned tbe defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Sitterson v. . SittersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Cooke v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Oliver v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API