Legal Opinion
United States v. Tham
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 11, 1997No. 95-9533PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
In August of 1995, a federal jury convicted Appellant Andy Tham of arson, mail fraud, and conspiracy to commit each of these substantive offenses. Pursuant to a cross-referencing provision contained in the arson sentencing guideline, the district court calculated Tham’s sentence in accordance with the first-degree murder sentencing guideline because the arson resulted in the death of a cofelon. On appeal, Tham asserts that the district court erred by admitting into evidence involuntary or coerced statements and by denying his motions for judgment of acquittal. Tham also…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Wong Kim Bo, A/K/A Yee Kuk Ho, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel ZAPATA, Luis Ocampo, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Stephen John JordiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BarakatCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.